The "Fallen Angels Code" : as decoded to date

User's Login

Latest Posts

Jim · Last edited by Jim on Mar 12, 2009 - 04:01 AM; edited 11 times in total

This Is Highly OFF THE WALL stuff. The part of it in this post is the scriptural background to the Fallen Angels Code.

Jim · Posted: Jul 25, 2007 - 05:34 AM Post subject:

This Part is the explanation of the setup of the code. As best I can determine, after the fallen Angels left, the people they had enslaved fled the valley where they had been, (That is in the part of the code not completely cracked). Two groups of them, (Nephilim part of Code & Rephaim part of code), arrived in a village, that was far enough away that the people there had been unaware that the Fallen Angels had even been on Earth. The escapees told their story to the people in that village who recorded it. There are elements in the code which talk about "Duplicate Testimony" and "Foolish Secrecy" As nearly as I can determine, (pure assumption, based on how could it have come to be encoded in the manner it is), the villagers assigned one scribe to each group of people who had been together at the time of the Fallen Angels arrival.

Jim · Posted: Jul 28, 2007 - 03:39 AM Post subject:

This post contains that part of the code that I have broken to date. I do not claim to have done a perfect job of it; I am not a professional code breaker, and I did not use a computer to do it. It was done by hand before I even had a computer. What I am showing here is simply the fact that the code exists; and the nature of its contents. There is far more of it still to be decoded than I have thus far done.

NOTE : The Code Does contain the statement : "They ARE Mortal".
Well that is all I have done on it; and probably all I ever will do. The future is more important than the past methinks; and there isn't much time left.

kalabok · Posted: Jul 28, 2007 - 12:16 PM Post subject:

i have to admit, i red the whole thread just now and my first opinion was - you are nuts, jim. days before i was scrolling down, wondering about finding pics of women and reading something about nuclear war ... quite unusual for an old computer forum.

on one hand i do not know anything about the sources you are refering to, i never red one of the testaments. my whole position to the bible is quite critical, allthough i never was dealing with it deeply.

on the other hand i am a scientist. there are a lot of facts which cannot be explained by the bible or even are wrong in it. dont get me wrong, i dont think anybody will achieve to get a provement of existence of god (or the opposite), it will be a question of believe till eternity.

speaking about me, i would claim myself as a "bright". i dont think books as the genesis are able to predict the future, i do think the evolution theory is far more logic then the way explained by the old testament. for me the bible is a funny story book, not more.

last i wanted to say my respect for the work you are doing. no need to post your iq test here, every mental work has a deeper sense for a number of peaple. most just dont understand them.

Jim · Posted: Jul 28, 2007 - 04:10 PM Post subject:

I have been following the hits on this post; and I find it interesting that it has generated several hundred hits since I edited it to put in the "Fallen Angels" code; but no responses whatsoever. I am curious about that. Do people think I am wrong in my understanding of what is in there? - or is it a case of not knowing enough to comment? - or what?

tazwegion · Posted: Jul 29, 2007 - 07:25 AM Post subject:

"Although the Neanderthal brain was larger than that of humans today, it does not mean that the Neanderthals were more intelligent, because brain size is related to body size and the temperature of the environment." - Viktoriya Shchupak

Jim · Posted: Jul 29, 2007 - 10:42 AM Post subject:

Edit : 17 Aug 2008
Have now completed the bulk of the "Notes" to my 57 verse "Bible Poem" (Upwards of 100 pages including "The Fallen Angels Code" in this thread.) Anyone here wants a copy of the whole thing, let me know. The poem is designed to explain the Bible, (as I understand it), and the "Notes" are designed to explain the poem. Sample verse follows :

tazwegion · Posted: Jul 29, 2007 - 11:44 AM Post subject:

Jim · Posted: Jul 29, 2007 - 12:26 PM Post subject:

Removed

tazwegion · Posted: Jul 29, 2007 - 12:54 PM Post subject:

Not really, Eskimoes are in the 'Homo sapiens sapiens' catagory...

Refinement, miniaturisation, development & evolution don't only exist in the world of electronics do they? weren't you mentioning devine design earlier?

kalabok · Posted: Jul 29, 2007 - 01:08 PM Post subject:

hard to deal with every point of your argumentation, but i would point out some things concerning evolution theory.

1. the creation of eve.
from scientific point of view, cloning a complex organism by using its dna is possible since "dolly" - a 1:1 copy of its sister sheep. if the creator would have done it that way, no reproduction would be possible. but even if eve is a female copy of adams genes, the rate of inbreeding would cause a high level of mortality and debilism for next generations.

2. variety of flora and fauna / organized chaos

the crucial question in evolution theory - does happenstance in a complex environment lead to a certain order? it is easy to argue with a higher level intelligence, which is organizing the life on earth. sorry, jim, but this sounds to me as well as thin air arguments. what scientist do have are fossils, 14C analysis and a lot of question with no answer.

what you have to be aware of, is the amount of time, the evolution had to develope. the poor variety, the lack of four-eyed organisms - maybe its just a quetion of time. the evolution does not say, that we are the last state of creation. in some 10^6-8 years there maybe will be creatures with 4 legs, 7 eyes ... but time is needed.

if some day we discover that we are sitting in a glove box and some higher living forms are just playing with us - ok, fine, darwin had good but false ideas. but till then i assume we are alone out there.
maybe the evolution theory sounds logic to me, because i was taught it in school.

3. the evidence of god

it is so far an interesting discussion, because i had a similar with my room mates from pakistan. they are trying to convince me about the existence of allah. the ku´ran has as well a lot of frases, which on first look do realy astonish - like the existance and non-miscibility of two sort of water, salty and sweet. trajectories of earth, sun and moon are predicted. they showed me the theory of airy and pratt (isostasis theory, 1855) written in ku´ran 1500 years ago. as well as einsteins theory was used to explain the one-night-trip of mohammad to jerusalem.
but it sounds more to me like - scanning the book for frases, that more or less fit with the actual knowledge of science. i can obtain same arguments just permitting a complete different world of physics and chemistry. and on finding something fitting with it to say - oh, thats an argument for god.

Jim · Posted: Jul 29, 2007 - 03:07 PM Post subject:

Removed

Jim · Posted: Jul 31, 2007 - 03:00 AM Post subject:

Removed

Jim · Posted: Aug 01, 2007 - 12:41 AM Post subject:

Removed

kalabok · Posted: Aug 01, 2007 - 01:01 PM Post subject:

its not about the interest. talking about me, i would be happy to discuss the topic more deeply. but it would be better to do so in toronto or zurich. with some german beer maybe.
its a question of time for me know. since i have no internet at home anymore, no time for larger discussions now. on saturday i am away for a month, what you can do is sending your written work to me. ill try to read it.
see ya soon

Sep 03, 2010 - 08:08 AM