Everest and the MS 694T pro

Discussion about systems that do not use the K6-x processors.
Post Reply
User avatar
Veteran K6'er
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:22 pm

Everest and the MS 694T pro

Post by Stedman5040 »

I have a Tualatin P III-s 1.266MHz cpu in a MSI board with 512Mb cl2 pc133 memory. At boot up the everest scores using 2.20 home version give

MR/MW/ML 1024/216/100.8

After browsing the internet for a while I run Everest again and get

MR/MW/ML 1024/262/100.8

That's like 20% boost in MW with no tweaking of anything.

Any ideas?

Stedman :?
K6'er Elite
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:11 pm

Post by DonPedro »

this reminds me on what we have watched on several occasions of benching our socket7-systems, don't you remember (about a year ago)?

we discussed that strange behaviour ad nauseam and came to no usefull explanation of why this happens and under what circumstances. not only did everest scores benefit of running it after some other software, but also did the scores of sandra and superpi.
K6'er Elite
Posts: 1745
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 7:10 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by Jim »

Increased level of cache hits for some reason or other. That can be confirmed by running a cache hit tracker in the background during both tests.
Superpuppy 3
K6-3+ 450 ACZ (6x100)
DFI K6BV3+/66 Rev B2 (2 Meg) w/ 2x28mm Chipset Fans
2x256 Meg PC 133 Hynix SDRAM
1x 20G Maxtor (7200)
2x 80G Maxtor (7200) Ducted w/ 2x486 Fans Mount
52/24/52/16 LG CDR/RW/DVD
8/4/3/12/24/16/32 LG Super Multi
ATI 9000 aiw Radeon AGP
SB Audigy 1 MP3 Sound
CMD 649 IDE Controller
NEC USB 2 Card
Post Reply