I believe that after AMD stopped making the desktop K6, they continued
to make an embedded version of the K6+, which ran on 1.8 volts.
I have come accross a few mentions that these could be overclocked
past 600 MHz with a standard fan.
Now I have been checking for AMD K6 in online auction sites over the
last few years, and I have never seen any of these <embedded> K6
CPUs for sale. So are these things still ticking away, or have they
not been salvaged?
where are the embedded K6+ ??
RE: where are the embedded K6+ ??
I have not seen any K6 E processors. They did make a K6-3 500 ANZ that ran at 1.8 v. and could be OCed upwards of 600 Mhz. Kalabok, (a member here), had some of them for sale.
Superpuppy 3
K6-3+ 450 ACZ (6x100)
DFI K6BV3+/66 Rev B2 (2 Meg) w/ 2x28mm Chipset Fans
2x256 Meg PC 133 Hynix SDRAM
1x 20G Maxtor (7200)
2x 80G Maxtor (7200) Ducted w/ 2x486 Fans Mount
52/24/52/16 LG CDR/RW/DVD
8/4/3/12/24/16/32 LG Super Multi
ATI 9000 aiw Radeon AGP
SB Audigy 1 MP3 Sound
CMD 649 IDE Controller
NEC USB 2 Card
K6-3+ 450 ACZ (6x100)
DFI K6BV3+/66 Rev B2 (2 Meg) w/ 2x28mm Chipset Fans
2x256 Meg PC 133 Hynix SDRAM
1x 20G Maxtor (7200)
2x 80G Maxtor (7200) Ducted w/ 2x486 Fans Mount
52/24/52/16 LG CDR/RW/DVD
8/4/3/12/24/16/32 LG Super Multi
ATI 9000 aiw Radeon AGP
SB Audigy 1 MP3 Sound
CMD 649 IDE Controller
NEC USB 2 Card
- Stedman5040
- Veteran K6'er
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:22 pm
The K6+ embedded processors did not have any specific markings to say that they were embedded such as an E mark. Basically there were a number of K6-3+ cpu's that were used as embedded processors. They were differentiated as high powered and low powered versions. So for instance the K6-3+/400ATZ is a low powered embedded processor. The K6-3+/550ACR was a high powered embedded processor. If you search the AMD site well enough you can get hold of the K6-3+ and K6-2+ embedded data sheets. They are 23542a [1] and 23543a [1] pdf files
I have a number of these embedded cpu's and have found them to not be any better or worse than the original laptop cpu's such as K6-3+/450ACZ. Got to say though that I have never had the good fortune to try a 550ACR. Having said that I have never been able to run a K6plus cpu beyond 630Mhz on a normal air cooled set up.
Stedman
I have a number of these embedded cpu's and have found them to not be any better or worse than the original laptop cpu's such as K6-3+/450ACZ. Got to say though that I have never had the good fortune to try a 550ACR. Having said that I have never been able to run a K6plus cpu beyond 630Mhz on a normal air cooled set up.
Stedman
In Deutchland, here they are ...
http://cgi.ebay.de/SOKET-7-BOARD-bis-60 ... 286.c0.m14
Best regards.
http://cgi.ebay.de/SOKET-7-BOARD-bis-60 ... 286.c0.m14
Best regards.
K6-3E+ ATZ /400 @600 Mhz (120*5)
DFI K6BV3+/66 rev B1 / 512 Ko L3
768 Go ram
3Dfx VooDoo5 5500
Hd WD 80Go Ide / Dvd Rom LG
Usb 2.0 / Fast Ethernet / Windows 7
DFI K6BV3+/66 rev B1 / 512 Ko L3
768 Go ram
3Dfx VooDoo5 5500
Hd WD 80Go Ide / Dvd Rom LG
Usb 2.0 / Fast Ethernet / Windows 7
Every once in a while, you see one of these embedded chips for sale. The only difference between them and a standard K6-III+ is that they can run on less than 2.0 v, and were normally marked at 1.8 or 1.6v. Back around 2001, I heard of someone running a K6-III+ 550 1.8v chip at 672 MHz on 2.1v, but couldn't go any higher than that. There were rumors of people hitting 744 (6*124) on an FIC VA-503+, but I never saw any proof that was actually achieved. If they did, that would have been a screamer in its day.
The architecture was theoretically capable of going that high. ALi created the Aladdin 7 chipset because they thought AMD was going to keep making K6-III+ chips at speeds above 600 MHz, using a 133 MHz bus. But their yields on the Athlon were so good, and the demand for it so high, that they killed the idea.
The architecture was theoretically capable of going that high. ALi created the Aladdin 7 chipset because they thought AMD was going to keep making K6-III+ chips at speeds above 600 MHz, using a 133 MHz bus. But their yields on the Athlon were so good, and the demand for it so high, that they killed the idea.
FIC VA-503+, Rev. 1.2, AMD K6-III+ 450@550MHz, 80GB Seagate ATA-100, 3dfx Voodoo3 3500 TV, TB Montego II Quadzilla, Win98se, 384MB PC100
Compaq Presario 1273, AMD K6-III+ 450@400MHz 1.8v, 40GB Samsung 5400RPM, extremely hacked Win98SE, 288 (yes, 288!) MB RAM
(Also an AMD FX-8350, which does the heavy lifting these days...)
Compaq Presario 1273, AMD K6-III+ 450@400MHz 1.8v, 40GB Samsung 5400RPM, extremely hacked Win98SE, 288 (yes, 288!) MB RAM
(Also an AMD FX-8350, which does the heavy lifting these days...)
RE: where are the embedded K6+ ??
thanks for the tipSteven67 wrote:In Deutchland, here they are ...
http://cgi.ebay.de/SOKET-7-BOARD-bis-60 ... 286.c0.m14
Best regards.
ebay only shows me English-speaking countries when I search.
Ich kann Deutsch lesen.
K6 3+ embedded
hello,
nice if this link can help you to find your 'baby' ...
I bought mine in France, but I think it came from this vendor in Deutchland.
It runs fine @600 with 2,1-2,2 volts and 617-620 is ok with 2,4 volts. I have never tried 2,5 volts nor read someone runs @2,5 volts.
Here is @617 mhz
However, you can find an 'embedded' reached 692 mhz in the french o/c database, here :
http://www.hardware.fr/myocdb.com/categorie47.html
My K6-III+ (@6*100) is here :
http://www.hardware.fr/myocdb.com/fiche20647.html
Good luck.
nice if this link can help you to find your 'baby' ...
I bought mine in France, but I think it came from this vendor in Deutchland.
It runs fine @600 with 2,1-2,2 volts and 617-620 is ok with 2,4 volts. I have never tried 2,5 volts nor read someone runs @2,5 volts.
Here is @617 mhz
However, you can find an 'embedded' reached 692 mhz in the french o/c database, here :
http://www.hardware.fr/myocdb.com/categorie47.html
My K6-III+ (@6*100) is here :
http://www.hardware.fr/myocdb.com/fiche20647.html
Good luck.
K6-3E+ ATZ /400 @600 Mhz (120*5)
DFI K6BV3+/66 rev B1 / 512 Ko L3
768 Go ram
3Dfx VooDoo5 5500
Hd WD 80Go Ide / Dvd Rom LG
Usb 2.0 / Fast Ethernet / Windows 7
DFI K6BV3+/66 rev B1 / 512 Ko L3
768 Go ram
3Dfx VooDoo5 5500
Hd WD 80Go Ide / Dvd Rom LG
Usb 2.0 / Fast Ethernet / Windows 7
its been a while ...
hello @ all
yeah, thats true - have a look at the p561a specs, this socket 7 mobo was designed for cpus which never existed
actually every non-ACZ model k6 plus is a "E = embedded" version - there are the standard ACR (2,0 V) and the low voltage versions (down to 1,5 V)
there were peaple in this forum who reached the 800mhz limit with phase change cooling (search for user named turrican).
hello @ all
jsc1973 wrote: The architecture was theoretically capable of going that high. ALi created the Aladdin 7 chipset because they thought AMD was going to keep making K6-III+ chips at speeds above 600 MHz, using a 133 MHz bus. But their yields on the Athlon were so good, and the demand for it so high, that they killed the idea.
yeah, thats true - have a look at the p561a specs, this socket 7 mobo was designed for cpus which never existed
actually every non-ACZ model k6 plus is a "E = embedded" version - there are the standard ACR (2,0 V) and the low voltage versions (down to 1,5 V)
there were peaple in this forum who reached the 800mhz limit with phase change cooling (search for user named turrican).
- Attachments
-
- p561a_specs.JPG (17.85 KiB) Viewed 12063 times
Hey Stedman (or anyone),
Would you be willing to part with one of your embedded CPUs? I wanted to use it for a NAS. I currently use a 450Mhz plus CPU, so if you have a 450 or higher (I read on press releases from 2000 that AMD shipped up to 550Mhz on these embedded units), let me know. Otherwise, maybe I could just stick with what I have.
Funny how I wrote the above, and now I want one (sold it long ago). Ironic.
Would you be willing to part with one of your embedded CPUs? I wanted to use it for a NAS. I currently use a 450Mhz plus CPU, so if you have a 450 or higher (I read on press releases from 2000 that AMD shipped up to 550Mhz on these embedded units), let me know. Otherwise, maybe I could just stick with what I have.
Funny how I wrote the above, and now I want one (sold it long ago). Ironic.