The "Fallen Angels Code" : as decoded to date

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Sat Dec 03, 2005 9:11 pm

This Is Highly OFF THE WALL stuff. The part of it in this post is the scriptural background to the Fallen Angels Code.

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:34 pm

This Part is the explanation of the setup of the code. As best I can determine, after the fallen Angels left, the people they had enslaved fled the valley where they had been, (That is in the part of the code not completely cracked). Two groups of them, (Nephilim part of Code & Rephaim part of code), arrived in a village, that was far enough away that the people there had been unaware that the Fallen Angels had even been on Earth. The escapees told their story to the people in that village who recorded it. There are elements in the code which talk about "Duplicate Testimony" and "Foolish Secrecy" As nearly as I can determine, (pure assumption, based on how could it have come to be encoded in the manner it is), the villagers assigned one scribe to each group of people who had been together at the time of the Fallen Angels arrival.

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:39 pm

This post contains that part of the code that I have broken to date. I do not claim to have done a perfect job of it; I am not a professional code breaker, and I did not use a computer to do it. It was done by hand before I even had a computer. What I am showing here is simply the fact that the code exists; and the nature of its contents. There is far more of it still to be decoded than I have thus far done.

NOTE : The Code Does contain the statement : "They ARE Mortal".
Well that is all I have done on it; and probably all I ever will do. The future is more important than the past methinks; and there isn't much time left.

EDIT :

Further to what I said about the "Fallen Angels Code", I found my little notebook in which I started to work on the "Anakim" section of the code which deals with the enslavement of humans by the "Fallen Angels", the repair of the "Fallen Angels" spaceship, the cohitation with human women by the "Fallen Angels" and the bearing of children sired by the "Fallen Angels". What follows is a list of "Strong's" Hebrew Dictionary numbers and their meanings :

5645 : Darkness
5647 : Enslave
5648 : Work
5649 : Servant
5650 : Bondage
5652 : Work
5653 : Work
5654 : Worker Of Edom
5655 : Serving God
5656 : Work Bondage
5657 : Store Of Servants
5658 : Servitude
5659 : Servitude Bondage
5678 : Anger Rage
5707 : Wittness
5713 : Testimony
5715 : Wittness Testimony
5749 : Duplicate Testimony
5750 : Repeatedly
5753 : Commit Iniquity
5758 : Perverseness
5759 : A Babe
5760 : Ungodly
5762 : Ruin(s)
5763 : Suckle Give Milk
5764 : A Babe Infant
5765 : Unrighteous
5766 : Evil Wickedness
5767 : Unjust Unrighteous A Burnt Offering
5768 : A Suckling Child
5769 : Always Perpetual
5770 : To Watch
5771 : Evil Fault Sin
5772 : Sexual Cohabitation
5773 : Perversity
5774 : To Fly - Flee
5775 : A Bird
5776 : A Fowl
5777 : Lead (Metal)
5778 : Birdlike
5779 : Take Advice
5780 : Consultation
5781 : To Be Pressed
5782 : To Wake Up - Opening Of The Eyes
5783 : To Be Made Naked
5786 : Blind
5787 : Blind
5788 : Blindness
5789 : To Hasten
5790 : To Speak In Season
5791 : To Wrest - Overthrow
5792 : Wrong
5793 : Succoring
5794 : Strong Fierce Greedy
5795 : He Goats
5796 : Goat
5797 : Boldness Loud Might
5798 : Strength
5799 : Azazel (Azazel was one of the "Fallen Angels" - the one who taught men mining and metalworking according to the Book Of Enoch, further the one of whom GOD said "To him ascribe ALL sin".
5800 : Relinquish Fall Forsake Leave.

Those are from Strong's Hebrew Dictionary in alphabetical order in Hebrew. I find there is a definite drift to it. Those are not random words, they convey a message.

kalabok · Post by **kalabok** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:16 am

i have to admit, i red the whole thread just now and my first opinion was - you are nuts, jim. days before i was scrolling down, wondering about finding pics of women and reading something about nuclear war ... quite unusual for an old computer forum.

on one hand i do not know anything about the sources you are refering to, i never red one of the testaments. my whole position to the bible is quite critical, allthough i never was dealing with it deeply.

on the other hand i am a scientist. there are a lot of facts which cannot be explained by the bible or even are wrong in it. dont get me wrong, i dont think anybody will achieve to get a provement of existence of god (or the opposite), it will be a question of believe till eternity.

speaking about me, i would claim myself as a "bright". i dont think books as the genesis are able to predict the future, i do think the evolution theory is far more logic then the way explained by the old testament. for me the bible is a funny story book, not more.

last i wanted to say my respect for the work you are doing. no need to post your iq test here, every mental work has a deeper sense for a number of peaple. most just dont understand them.

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 8:10 am

I have been following the hits on this post; and I find it interesting that it has generated several hundred hits since I edited it to put in the "Fallen Angels" code; but no responses whatsoever. I am curious about that. Do people think I am wrong in my understanding of what is in there? - or is it a case of not knowing enough to comment? - or what?

tazwegion · Post by **tazwegion** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:25 pm

"Although the Neanderthal brain was larger than that of humans today, it does not mean that the Neanderthals were more intelligent, because brain size is related to body size and the temperature of the environment." - Viktoriya Shchupak

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:42 am

Edit : 17 Aug 2008
Have now completed the bulk of the "Notes" to my 57 verse "Bible Poem" (Upwards of 100 pages including "The Fallen Angels Code" in this thread.) Anyone here wants a copy of the whole thing, let me know. The poem is designed to explain the Bible, (as I understand it), and the "Notes" are designed to explain the poem. Sample verse follows :

tazwegion · Post by **tazwegion** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:44 am

Jim wrote:Viktoriya Shchupak did not, (at least in this quote), state exactly what said relationship is. With that kind of rationale peoples living in x environment for millienna should have developed larger brains than those who do not. (Which for all I know they may have, though I do not believe that any geographical locality in the world boasts people with 10% larger brains than some other locality).

The size of a brain and skull cavitiy can be linked to the developing brains' method of heat regulation...

Constraints on brain size: The radiator hypothesis - Dean Falk FSU

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:26 am

Removed

tazwegion · Post by **tazwegion** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:54 am

Not really, Eskimoes are in the 'Homo sapiens sapiens' catagory...

Refinement, miniaturisation, development & evolution don't only exist in the world of electronics do they? weren't you mentioning devine design earlier?

kalabok · Post by **kalabok** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:08 am

hard to deal with every point of your argumentation, but i would point out some things concerning evolution theory.

1. the creation of eve.
from scientific point of view, cloning a complex organism by using its dna is possible since "dolly" - a 1:1 copy of its sister sheep. if the creator would have done it that way, no reproduction would be possible. but even if eve is a female copy of adams genes, the rate of inbreeding would cause a high level of mortality and debilism for next generations.

2. variety of flora and fauna / organized chaos

the crucial question in evolution theory - does happenstance in a complex environment lead to a certain order? it is easy to argue with a higher level intelligence, which is organizing the life on earth. sorry, jim, but this sounds to me as well as thin air arguments. what scientist do have are fossils, 14C analysis and a lot of question with no answer.

what you have to be aware of, is the amount of time, the evolution had to develope. the poor variety, the lack of four-eyed organisms - maybe its just a quetion of time. the evolution does not say, that we are the last state of creation. in some 10^6-8 years there maybe will be creatures with 4 legs, 7 eyes ... but time is needed.

if some day we discover that we are sitting in a glove box and some higher living forms are just playing with us - ok, fine, darwin had good but false ideas. but till then i assume we are alone out there.
maybe the evolution theory sounds logic to me, because i was taught it in school.

3. the evidence of god

it is so far an interesting discussion, because i had a similar with my room mates from pakistan. they are trying to convince me about the existence of allah. the ku´ran has as well a lot of frases, which on first look do realy astonish - like the existance and non-miscibility of two sort of water, salty and sweet. trajectories of earth, sun and moon are predicted. they showed me the theory of airy and pratt (isostasis theory, 1855) written in ku´ran 1500 years ago. as well as einsteins theory was used to explain the one-night-trip of mohammad to jerusalem.
but it sounds more to me like - scanning the book for frases, that more or less fit with the actual knowledge of science. i can obtain same arguments just permitting a complete different world of physics and chemistry. and on finding something fitting with it to say - oh, thats an argument for god.

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:07 am

Removed

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Mon Jul 30, 2007 7:00 pm

Removed

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:41 pm

Removed

kalabok · Post by **kalabok** » Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:01 am

its not about the interest. talking about me, i would be happy to discuss the topic more deeply. but it would be better to do so in toronto or zurich. with some german beer maybe.
its a question of time for me know. since i have no internet at home anymore, no time for larger discussions now. on saturday i am away for a month, what you can do is sending your written work to me. ill try to read it.
see ya soon